They will simply get through more pages in the same amount of time. So this counterintuitively is a great way to approach this. Log analysis, this is sort of more traditional. Often it’s quite unintuitive which pages on your site or which parameters are actually sapping all of your crawl budget. Log analysis on large sites often yields surprising results, so that’s something you might consider. Then actually employing some of these tools. So redundant URLs that we don’t think users even need to look at, we can 301.
The Same Sort Of Crawling Benefit We’re
Variants that users do need to look at, we Costa Rica Phone Number List could look at a canonical or a noindex tag. But we also might want to avoid linking to them in the first place so that we’re not sort of losing some degree of PageRank into those canonicalized or noindex variants through dilution or through a dead end. Robots.txt and nofollow, as I sort of implied as I was going through it, these are tactics that you would want to use very sparingly because they do create these PageRank dead ends. Then lastly, a sort of recent or more interesting tip that I got a while back from an Ollie.
Still Not Indexing This Sort Of New
Mason blog post which I’ll probably link DT Leads to below, it turns out that if you have a sitemap on your site that you only use for fresh or recent URLs, your recently changed URLS, then because Googlebot has such a thirst, like I said, for fresh content, they will start crawling this sitemap very often. So you can sort of use this tactic to direct crawl budget towards the new URLs, which sort of everyone wins. Googlebot only wants to see the fresh URLs. You perhaps only want Googlebot to see the fresh URLs. So if you have a sitemap that only serves that purpose.