Still Counts As A Link And So You’re Losing

On the reviews for an entity, checking to see if they contain the search phrase. One star review from Daniel Dietrich for Robert S. Hay mond, MD. Lots of mentions of eye care here, but the body of reviews contains zero mentions of intestinal health. Another “no” vote. 4. Google could cross check the specified search phrases against all the knowledge they have from their crawls of the entity’s website Contact info on a website for an eye doctor. This activity should confirm that there is no on-site reference to Dr. Haymond being anything other than an ophthalmologist .

Although You Are Still Losing Some

Then Google would need to make a Benin Phone Number List calculation to downgrade the significance of the location (Angels Camp) based on internal logic that specifies that a user looking for a gastroenterologist in a city would prefer to see gastroenterologists a bit farther away than seeing eye doctors (or welders) nearby. So, this would be another “no” vote for inclusion as a result for our query. 5. Finally, Google could cross reference this crawl of the website against their wider crawl of the web Search results in Google for an ophthalmologist called Robert S. Haymond. This should act as a good, final confirmation that Dr.

Benin Phone Number List

Pagerank Through This Nofollow Link That

Hay mond is an eye doctor rather than DT Leads a gastroenterologist, even if he is in our desired city, and give us a fifth “no” vote for bringing his listing up in response to our query. The web is vast, and so is Google’s job, but I believe the key to resolving this particular type of filler content is for Google to rely more on the knowledge they have of an entity’s vertical and less on their knowledge of its location. A diner may be willing to swap out tacos for pizza if there’s a Mexican restaurant a block away but no pizzerias in town, but in these YMYL categories.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *